Category: Insights

Providing you a quick update on what’s been happening in the markets and a few topics we’re keeping an eye on.

Market Activity

Long-term – A lot has changed over the past two years, and a lot has stayed the same. In February of 2021, the S&P 500 closed at 3931 and 23x earnings. Today, roughly two years later, the market multiple has contracted to 17x earnings, but the index level is about the same. Dividends have been a big help over this time frame.

Short-term – Since around mid-October, seasonality factors, the completion of mid-term elections, and stronger and stronger hints of disinflation have helped the market put in a 3-month low. From there we’ve enjoyed a healthy, though bumpy, 10% rebound in the broader market, with decent breadth and momentum. We believe inflation remains the guiding light for the market and more hints of disinflation will serve as support. Due to the lagged effects of Fed interest rate policy, the level of economic damage done remains to be seen.

Source: Factset 01/25/23

Shorter-term – So far for the month of January, we’ve seen a rebound in growth names as we approached earnings season, and hopes for a Fed pivot have re-asserted themselves. The recent outperformance from the QQQ vs Equal-Weighted S&P climbed up to 5%. Our best guess is that this one-month outperformance in big-cap tech is a bounce and not a major change in trend. We still recommend tilting equity exposures towards companies with strong free cash flows and stable dividends.

Source: Factset 01/25/23

Valuation

One exercise I find useful at the beginning of a new year is a quick look at valuations across the equity space. As the charts below will show, the value opportunities appear to be in the mid-cap, small-cap, and value-tilted names. Mega-cap growth, while enjoying a reprieve this month, still looks expensive. 

Source: Factset 01/25/23

Source: Factset 01/25/23

Source: Factset 01/25/23

Bond Market and Fed Disconnect

“My 40 plus years of experience in finance strongly recommends that investors should look at what the market says over what the Fed says” – Jeff Gundlach

Fed officials have remained vocal that they expect to raise the Fed Funds rate to 5% and hold it there for longer than the market expects. The market doesn’t believe this and is pricing in cuts around the middle of this year. Recent weak economic data, particularly a contraction in the services sector, and negative month-over-month PPI and CPI readings have been accompanied by treasury yields dropping across the curve.

In predicting the actions of the Fed, one adage always seems to get it right, The Fed Follows the 2-Year.

While we don’t pretend to know exactly what the Fed will do, we do know that the 2-year is 0.3% below the Fed Funds rate and the market usually figures it out first. The only conclusion I can come to is that if the Fed indeed wants to hold rates higher for longer and avoid the stop-and-go mistakes of the 70s – they will need to wind down the rate hikes fairly soon, or prepare for some strong political pressure to cut rates later this year.  

Source: Factset 01/25/23

The Debt Ceiling

Back in early 2021, the US budget deficit hit $4 trillion in the aftermath of Covid aid. One year later, the deficit fell to $3 trillion – the largest fiscal tightening since the late 1940s, post WWII.  Since then, the deficit is reversing higher again due to increased interest costs. If you’ve been watching the news lately, you’ve probably heard some discussion about the looming debt ceiling fight in Washington. With the statutory debt limit of $31.4 trillion being bumped last week, Treasury head Janet Yellen is implementing “extraordinary measures” to keep the government afloat through the Spring.

“While Treasury is not currently able to provide an estimate of how long extraordinary measures will enable us to continue to pay the government’s obligations, it is unlikely that cash and extraordinary measures will be exhausted before early June” – Janet Yellen

June and July are set up to be very active in terms of legislative action. Republicans are pushing for discretionary spending cuts to cooperate on raising the debt ceiling and will need to pick where to specifically cut, unify around those cuts, and get that message out to the public soon. Should an agreement to raise the debt ceiling not be reached by this summer, House Republicans will likely try to pass a bill prioritizing interest payments as well as Social Security, Medicare, and defense. This will be a defensive measure to protect Republicans should the debate devolve and linger well past the Treasury’s exhaustion.  That’s about all we can predict at this point. It’s possible an agreement is reached earlier, and a repeat of the 2011 debt ceiling fiasco is avoided, but we’d bet on some fiscal fireworks this summer.

That said, we don’t think potential fiscal noise is any reason to deviate from an investment strategy, it will come and go. On August 5th, 2011, S&P downgraded US debt following congressional fighting over the debt ceiling – the market fell heading into that downgrade but quickly recovered and carved out a fresh high within the next year. We would view any potential market volatility during this summer, caused by fiscal woes, to be looked at as a buying opportunity.    

Have a great week,

Adam

Nothing about markets is ever obvious until after the fact. Looking back it’s always abundantly clear which direction things were headed and what we should have done differently, but after going through a few of these cycles in real time I can honestly say, from school-of-hard-knocks experience, that trying to time the market is indeed a fool’s errand. Fighting the urge to get off the rollercoaster during its most gut-wrenching periods takes all the discipline one can muster sometimes. With the S&P 500 bumping its head off the downward-sloping 200-day moving average for the third time this year it’s getting awfully obvious that the rally from the October lows has run out of steam. Sit it out and get back in at lower levels – that’s the temptation. But we know for certain that excess activity breeds mistakes that compound. If I’m looking out 5 years from now, those with discipline during these frustrating times are the ones who come out ahead.

However, some things indeed are obvious and can be capitalized on. If we’ve met in person you’ve probably heard me talk about money supply, liquidity, and the difference between long and short-duration equities. Some definitions:

M2 Money Supply is a broad measure of how much money is floating around in the economy in the form of cash, money markets, CDs, or other cash-like securities. It can be manipulated and managed by the Federal Reserve through bank reserve requirements, the Fed Funds rate, and outright open market operations. Generally, the Fed seeks to expand the money supply during times of economic stress and reduce the money supply when called to fight inflation. Fed cycles usually go on for a while and their actions have a significant impact on what types of equities work best.

Long-duration equities – companies with big long-term growth prospects. They typically have a higher-than-average level of debt on the balance sheet and strong top-line growth. Net income may be negative, and they generate very little or likely negative free cash flows. These stocks work very well when the discount rate on future cash flows is negligible and market liquidity is abundant. When the Fed is printing money, this is where it goes. Many of these companies don’t survive when higher borrowing rates are introduced and the access to capital to fuel their business dries up.

Short-duration equities – companies that generate a lot of free cash flow.  These are typically well-run businesses that generate positive earnings and a high amount of free cash for every dollar in sales. They can fund their own growth initiatives internally and aren’t at the mercy of capital markets to run their business. They usually carry a cheaper multiple as they don’t have any pie-in-the-sky growth story to tell. They simply run their business, generate cash, and usually pay a good dividend.

The past year has been a great example of how liquidity and money supply affect the market’s equity duration preferences. The chart below paints this picture clearly. The bottom chart is the year-over-year growth rate in US Money Supply. The top chart represents the performance of a basket of high free cash flow names relative to futuristic, long-duration, highly speculative equities. It was obvious in late 2020 that high-growth speculative tech was the place to be, because money was everywhere, and free cash flow, at that moment, didn’t mean anything. Who needs cash flow when money is free? Users, subs, and sales growth were all that mattered. How interesting that the very moment M2 growth began slowing, the companies that weren’t relying on free money to drive their business roared back into favor. It was obvious.      

Source: Factset. Chart generated 12/16/2022

Our last note we sent centered around the dynamics of the mid-term election cycle and how mid-term years are notoriously choppy with larger than average drawdowns. The good news is that 1-year returns after mid-terms are generally much better than average.

 

 

This week’s topic zooms way out to look at a concept which will influence long term relative returns – demographics.

Given the abundance of choices on where to place your equity allocations across the globe, one factor we like to be aware of is the demographic makeup of markets we’re investing in. Economics is simply the story of what people do, and different age cohorts do different things with money. Young people spend and save differently than their parents or grandparents. A young family of four is likely aspiring to upsize their house and buy a second car, needing mortgages and car loans. Grandparents meanwhile are looking to sell the house and downsize to a townhome. They’ll have liquid assets to manage and likely won’t be taking on any new debt.

A picture of a country’s demographics can help inform how dynamic its economy will be going forward. A rapidly aging economy creates deflationary pressure as loan growth slows, while a baby boom will typically lead to inflationary pressure and higher interest rates 20-30 years down the road.

Over the past week we’ve been reducing our exposure to international markets. With 40% of S&P profits originating overseas, we don’t feel that directly allocating direct added allocations to these markets offers enough diversification benefits to offset what is clearly a better long-term outlook here in the US relative to those markets.

Demographics aren’t the only factor we consider, but we certainly don’t think the structure of a nation’s population should be ignored either. Below are a few population pyramids we find interesting. Take a look and imagine what the next 20 years will look like for these countries. This is a subject I love exploring so if you have any questions or thoughts please don’t hesitate to give us a call.

Germany

 

Japan

 

Russia

 

South Korea

 

USA